Thursday, July 11, 2013

Lessons in the Local



I was walking around Old Town Saginaw with a friend one day and noticed this historical marker.  The facts displayed are nominal; one might rather say skeletal.  The real story has substance.

Erected in 1919 at the corner of S. Hamilton Street and Cass in Old Town Saginaw, this bronze plaque commemorates the 1819 Treaty of Saginaw between the United States Government and the Native American Tribes of the region, by which the Tribes ceded over 6 million acres of land.  Different accounts of the circumstances and formation of the treaty may be found here, here, here, and here.  Reading each of these accounts side by side, comparing text, has the effect of giving a richer, deeper understanding of a significant event that happened here, and subsequently beyond, to a region that includes Lansing, Midland, Alpena, Bay City, Saginaw, and Flint -- an event that has not been well-remembered in the culture we call America.

The monument words are,

"On this spot on the 24th day of September A.D. 1819 General Lewis Cass made and executed a Treaty with Chippewa Indians of Saginaw by which they ceded the largest part of their lands situated in Northeastern Michigan to the United States Government. This tablet was erected by the Daughters of the American Revolution and the City Federation of Women's Clubs 1919."

The monument should read,

On this spot on the 24th day of September A.D. 1819 General Lewis Cass bribed selected leaders of the Chippewa Indians into signing a Treaty by promising large reserves for them and their families. Cass also brought a standing military, enlisted the aid of influential Indian traders, and supplied copious amounts of alcohol to the gathered Chippewa, who came from all over the territory.  The predictable result was the Chippewa Indians ceding six million acres of land, situated in Northeastern Michigan, to the United States Government.  Cass was quoted to have said to a recalcitrant Chippewa leader, "If you don't treat with us, we'll take it anyway."

Below are other images of Old Town Saginaw as it exists today, as well as other monument-plaques of note.  Many reveal certain aspects of the psyches of colonizing Europeans as they relate to the Indigenous.




Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Last Best Lesson for Nothing

Saginaw: A miniature Detroit: de-industrialized, crumbling,  racially and socioeconomically segregated.  Like hundreds of cities in the Midwest, it's a hard town, down and out, used up by industrial capitalism, left to crumble by Clinton's NAFTA and easy big business money.  I'd never have guessed ending up in Saginaw, but here I am, having arrived via Midland, where I worked for 24 years making big teacher-bucks in one of the few Michigan school districts that, once upon a time, before anything public became the enemy, paid well.  But in my heart, I am an underdog for the underdog.  What better place for someone like me to live than an Ugly Underdog town like Saginaw?

What I love about Saginaw is that it is the location of one of the Hot Spots of U. S. Imperialism.  By that I mean U. S. expansionism, which could also be taken to mean Invasion and Occupation.  In other words, Murderous Dirty Double Dealings with Indians. It's all the same; then, and now in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, and most recently Syria, where the new Indians are.  The legacy of the Saginaw Event yet lingers like gunpowder smoke after Fourth of July fireworks at Ojibway Island.  Some of the principal players have names of old western films and books; no real surprise there, as this was the West.  Names like Ne-om-e, Chippewa Indian Chief; Louis Campau and Jacob Smith, Indian traders; Lewis Cass, United States Government agent and acting governor of the territory.  Oh, what truly came down!  Gleaned from White Man accounts, no less, one can uncover the real story . . . one who knows how to read, that is.  What it comes down to is this: the encroaching Americans were mother fuckers, one and all . . . even the White or Half-Breed traders, who befriended and won the hearts of Indians, then sold them out for a nice chunk of real estate as part of the deal. 

One day, four summers ago, I stumbled on that historical marker in Old Town Saginaw, commemorating the Treaty of Saginaw of 1819.  The marker, across the street from The Stable, a nifty bike shop that was once a funeral home, and reputedly haunted now, was sponsored and erected by the Daughters of the American Revolution in 1919, the same year my dad was born.  With so many big players having walked around the vicinity, no wonder The Stable is haunted.  With some knowledge about and interest in the history of European colonization of America, which pisses me off considerably, I suddenly found myself in what seemed the Center of the Universe of Moral Outrages, in this place I will be calling home, quite possibly until I take my last breath in some impossible situation.  I felt lucky, and inspired.  I knew of treaties with tribes generally, having long ago concluded they were, in principle, articles of theft.  I was hungry for the details of this one, and  I would not be disappointed.  I asked a handful older Saginaw residents with whom I am acquainted about the history of Saginaw, but the earliest period of which anyone had knowledge was the lumber era, quite celebrated on historical markers near the county courthouse, as you would expect a raping, colonizing peoples to do.  Anything about the Captains of Industry is Big News!  No one knew a whit about Saginaw prior, as though history began in the 1830s; about how, more precisely, the Native Americans got fucked by the encroaching colonizer class.  To be fair, there are some references to the Indians on plaques around here, like this one in the Eppel building, commemorating the military garrison, Old Fort Saginaw: Nothing but Indians, and muskrats and bullfrogs could possibly subsist here.  In September of 2011, the last year of my teaching career, I took a road map and highlighted the land giveaway, or more aptly, the land takeaway.  The amount of land ceded, and the shape of the area on a map seemed . . .




. . . arbitrary and capricious, which, based on my knowledge of the United States Constitution, violates, to begin with, the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.  It sucks not to be a bona fide colonist descendant, I suppose.  Posted is a photo of the road map, a map every Michigan motorist of my generation recognizes, but younger generations likely dismiss as a quaint artifact, now immersed in, of course, Digital World.  I took what amounted to outmoded teacher's tools, a green magic marker and highlighter, and colored in the approximately 6 million acres of land ceded to the United States Government by the Native Americans on September 24, 1819, following which I commenced tacking said map auspiciously to the bulletin board adjacent to the door of my classroom with what, as it turned out, were also relics: stainless steel tacks with flat, round heads.  I developed some lessons in my head about the history of the event, which I incorrectly imagined would spur interest in young people.  I dropped the lessons forthwith, and, subsequently, no student inquired about the highlighted section, displayed right to the last day of the year, and of my teaching career, which I was not sorry to let go.   More pointedly to the astute reader of this narrative, no history teacher in my department knew anything about the Treaty of Saginaw, a stark reminder of how a culture (no doubt accurately reflected by the K-12 educational establishment, if not, in large part, caused by it) chooses what to remember, and what to forget.  "Local history is part of the middle school curriculum," said my fellows.  No wonder I never engaged them beyond the superficial.

This web page, published in the Fall of 2011, was an education project for students that came to nothing. It was dedicated to the exploration of the circumstances surrounding the Treaty of Saginaw, a treaty different from all of treaties made between the United States and the Tribes only with respect to the names of the participants, the lands involved, and the incidence, or not, of violence; otherwise, it probably follows a prescription, or should I say, rubric, repeated countless and various times within this vast swath of land called the United States of America, and elsewhere around the world, then, and now. 


Divide and conquer techniques are the hallmark of colonial manipulation. Those indigenous individuals considered the friendliest to colonizer interests (that is, who offered the least amount of resistance) were singled out for special favors and rewards until they were firmly co-opted to do the colonizer’s bidding. Those who resisted colonizer interests most vehemently were targeted for particularly oppressive punishments. The collaborators are often distinguished in written records as the “friendly” or “good” Indians, while those who continued to resist co-optation were quickly identified as the “savage” or “hostile” Indians. The leaders, thinkers, peacemakers, warriors, spiritual leaders, healers and teachers who did not fall in line with the emerging order were isolated, dehumanized and diminished. Thus, colonizers ably and superbly fostered resentments between the two groups, pitting them against one another and always calling on the favorite “friendlies” to monitor their colonized cohort and enforce the colonial system. These divisions severely eroded the unity in Indigenous societies that were often simultaneously devastated from disease, warfare, forced removals, loss of homelands, mass killings, and policies of ethnic cleansing. The tremendous harm caused by generations of factionalism as a direct consequence of colonialism cannot be overstated as it has greatly affected the capacity of Indigenous Peoples to mobilize broadly for significant change.
- Waziyatawin, Dakota activist and scholar

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

On Teacher Objectivity

Very often in my career, I was accused of being non-objective. Teachers, especially of the social sciences, are supposed to be objective, they said.

To them, I offer this article about the objectivity of journalists.  Substitute the word teacher for journalist, and there you have it.  Come to think of it, the social studies teacher is very much like a journalist, or should be.  Social studies teachers who parrot the curriculum, as they almost all do, aren't worth a damn; they're following orders.

Monday, July 8, 2013

What is a teacher?

I never considered myself a teacher, as odd as that sounds . . . not in the traditional sense, anyway.  As a U. S. Government teacher, I resisted the pressure to canonize the American system, preferring instead to lay bare the facts.  I was a contrarian to expectations pushed by colleagues, curriculum, administration, parents, and quite often, students.  I resisted being a delivery system for state propaganda.  I felt it was my duty to not only unlearn what I had learned in my own education, but also to make sure students were aware of alternatives to how it came down in America, from 1492 to the present.

I paid a price.  I was labeled, dismissed, and marginalized.  I didn't care, mainly.  I thought my colleagues stupid, most students too far gone by what the system had done to them to pay me much mind.   It was a lonely existence, but I never gave up.

I am damn glad to be out of it.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

One Year Out

My friend, still in the profession, wants my thoughts about what it is like being a retired teacher. He is anticipating retirement in a little over a year from now. 

A little background first. I was a teacher for 29 years. I started in a Catholic High School. I was endorsed by the State of Michigan to teach English, art, and social studies. After a 3.5 year stint in the Catholic School, located in Dearborn, Michigan, I got a job in the Dearborn Public Schools -- specifically Fordson High School, where I taught English and art. Then, due to my disappointment with the district over its salary schedule, settled upon by negotiations between the district and a corrupt union, I managed to leave Dearborn by getting a job in the Midland Public Schools, where the salary was acceptable and where I worked for the next 24 years, from August 1988 until June 2012. For the first seven years in Midland, I taught in an alternative school for at-risk students. After that, I taught for two years in a middle school before settling in for the remainder of my career at H. H. Dow High School, from 1997 until June 2012.

My first thought one year out is personal astonishment at having put up with the profession for as long as I did. Check that, I don't see it as a profession. A teacher is a minion, a slave, a deliverer of programs set by autocrats called administrators and school board members. There is a certain amount of lip service given to nurturing critical thinking capacities in that world, for students and among colleagues, but I assert that no such exists and is in fact discouraged, even punished.


My overarching thought these days is that I feel like Andy DuFresne. I escaped from an institution that is uncomfortably similar to a penitentiary.